A shared specialist network across several countries
Multi-country
Neighbouring health systems, each short of different specialists, sharing one governed network instead of competing for the same few hires.

- Specialties
- Several
- Model
- Programme partnership
- Scope
- Multi-country
The situation
When neighbouring countries face different specialist gaps, each tends to solve them alone. Typical obstacles:
- Every system missing a different set of specialties
- No shared infrastructure for cross-border clinical collaboration
- Uncertainty about licensing, data protection and liability across borders
- Different protocols and reporting requirements in each system
How we would set it up
We would set up the governance first, then the clinical network:
- A cross-border framework covering licensing, credentialing and accountability in each country
- Secure, compliant technology for case sharing and consultation
- Shared clinical protocols, adapted to each local context
- One specialist network serving all partners, with clear scope for each engagement
- Local clinical ownership in every country, with regional coordination
What we would measure
We agree the measures with the partner before launch, record a baseline, and review them together on a regular cadence.
- Specialist availability in each participating system
- Consultation turnaround times
- Clinician and patient experience of remote consultation
- Compliance and incident reporting across borders

Facing something similar?
Tell us about your health system and we’ll talk through how an engagement could be shaped around it.

